🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner added half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it because then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. So there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.