🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage is likely the perfect selection for a audacious scary movie centered on the biblical figure, though not for the motivations some viewers could guess. In reality, the star does not even portray the central religious figure in The Carpenter’s Son: the part he plays is listed only as The Carpenter. Cage is framed as a father figure in this story, working to maintain his beliefs as the teenage character (played by Noah Jupe), their adolescent foster child, starts to display divine powers. The reason it's challenging to picture any other leading star taking this character is that although the role is weighed down with multiple difficulties, the actor appears almost touchingly certain that this gloomy, bleak feature is a valuable project.

The Actor's Recent Film Selections

Nicolas Cage has been allocating his time more carefully lately. He yet stars in more movies than most regular audiences will ever see — for example, are you aware that the man has made a trio of different cowboy movies in the past three years? — but he also adds high-profile critically acclaimed roles like Dream Scenario, Pig, and a further title. The Carpenter’s Son sounds like one of those, as it’s borderline horror, potentially provocative, and approaches a exaggerated description with gravity.

The Film's Storyline and Execution

Regrettably, writer-director the director does not reward the audience's focus. The film begins with a interestingly wandering setting, positioned as based on an unknown scripture concerning the youthful days of the messiah. The Carpenter, The Mother, and their child move constantly, afraid of religious persecution or distrust about their son's strange powers. “Disaster trails us,” The Carpenter gloomily remarks. This persists when evil influences attack them at their new home, initiating with that familiar Biblical temptation for the son.

Occasionally, the film mirrors an Exorcist-style supernatural thriller, except that none of the central roles are explicitly taken over. On the contrary, they become more and more distant mutually, while these powers influence a local young woman (the actress, listed as “The Stranger”) who the son connects to, and gives each character unsettling premonitions of a dark tomorrow. The Carpenter notably fights with his role within the plot, at times chastising his child he can’t fully understand.

Debate and Sensitivity

The subject matter is prone to court controversy, and Nathan approaches it with plenty of care — excessive, possibly. The concept of a adolescent facing his future martyrdom and seduced by unknown powers is indeed terrifying, but the filmmaker could be wary of seeming gratuitous and eager to telegraph his intentions, therefore he regularly withdraws to gloomily threatening filming. The roles constantly ponder — FKA Twigs, who demonstrated real promise in the 2024 Crow remake, of all things — surrenders her role to her Mother Mary cloak, sometimes broken up by some gnarly horror imagery.

The Star's Acting and Film's Flaws

Simultaneously, Cage flirts with exactly the kind of melodramatic acting that his ironic fans might be looking for. An instance (featured) in previews where he flips out and yells “My faith has been shattered!” Should such of theatrical release is included in your biblical thriller, possibly a more openly absurd approach would make better use of the actor's readiness to exaggerate if needed. On the other hand, The Carpenter’s Son echoes the poorer straight-to-DVD movies the actor filmed through much of the 2010s — apart from the B-movies instead the dramas and ghost stories that typically appear interesting, and often contain a few choice Cage moments, but in the end seem like, well, inexpensive direct-to-consumer content.

Truthfully, a number of those, while less ambitious, were easier to view as a whole. This is when I have to violate my usual practice, not faith-based but professional: Years back, a respected mentor urged me to remove adjectives like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my film-criticism vocabulary. These phrases convey little except a subjective and vaguely expressed lack of patience, withdrawing from the duty of vividly conveying the intellectual and feeling of viewing a particular movie. It’s difficult to express monotony without appearing dull oneself. It's just as unclear as labeling a movie “notable.” “Elaborate,” in other words.

Yet, I acknowledge, I was bored during much of the film. On the positive side, it is a religious style of boredom, not due to The Carpenter’s Son is lecturing, but because it requires a type of dutiful submission to sit through it. After a while in the beginning, this feature locks into a monotonous pattern of simmering distress, and never really