🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, however, could coincide too neatly with the carefully constructed image circulated by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

Over a long period, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to forge a made-to-measure persona of the president. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a TV series released last fall, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a invented security officer selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from chaos. While the character's name Mikhail, the implication is clear: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this identical story rather than undercutting it. A new film based on a popular book aims to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a symptom, moving the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to stabilise the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged him to take the job. The position was effectively a casting call with many contenders. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the state de facto.

• His list included various figures, including an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• Per an expert who studied his rise, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the process stated the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the image of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by the actor's debut as 007. The grittier interpretation prompted local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Mashup posters swapping Craig’s face with Putin’s appeared on city centers, fueling the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an star popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the opportunity to frame his casting as a small victory. Its exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. He is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. Now, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the exact legends it might seek to question.